PARAMETER C: ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

MASTER IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Parameter A

Parameter B

Parameter C

Parameter D

Parameter E

Parameter F

Each button is linked to the specific parameter. Please click the respective button to access the parameter of interest and its specific benchmark statements.

SYSTEM – INPUTS AND PROCESSES

S.1 The program of studies has a system of evaluating student performance through a combination of the following;

S.1.1. formative tests such as quizzes, unit tests;

S.1.2. summative tests such as mid-term and final examination;

S.1.3. project and term papers;

S.1.4. practicum and performance tests;

S.2 The summative tests have the following descriptions:

S.2.1. comprehensive enough to test the different levels of cognitive skills and knowledge content; and

S.2.2. based on a well-designed Table of Specifications (TOS)

IMPLEMENTATION

I.1 Varied evaluation measures are used, such as

I.1.1. portfolio;

I.1.2. rubric assessment;

I.1.3. skills demonstration;

I.1.4. paper and pencil tests;

I.1.5. oral examinations;

I.1.6. group/individual reports;

I.1.7. group/individual study/projects;

I.2 Evaluation tools/instruments are reviewed and revised periodically.

I.3 The faculty members are trained on how to assess student performance properly.

I.4 The College/Academic Unit encourages and supports assessment for multiple intelligences.

I.5 Course and test requirements are returned to the students after the results are checked, recorded, and analyzed.

I.6 The system of student evaluation and grading is defined, understood, and disseminated to the:

I.6.1. students;

I.6.2. faculty;

I.6.3. academic administrators; and

I.6.4. parents/guardians.

OUTCOME/S

O.1 The students' academic performance is commendable.

O.2 Retention rate of students is on average.